The Art and Science Behind Marketing Technology
In: Numbers
3 Nov 2010Most companies are constantly focused on growth. It makes sense at first. You’re either growing or dying right?
But to grow means you need more resources and maybe more funding or sales. Ironically, most companies go belly-up despite strong growth.
What kills them is the pace of the growth. Twitter has grown so fast it’s had problems with its engineering keeping up with the adoption rate. Good problems to have no doubt but problems nonetheless.
Enter 37Signals and their obtuse approach to business. Inc.com recently ran an article by their founder, Jason Fried, and his strategy for pricing a new iPod app at almost 10X the normal app price ($9.99 vs. $.99).
So far, we’ve sold nearly 2,000 copies of Draft. That’s about $20,000 in revenue. We are much happier with $20,000 in revenue from 2,000 customers than $20,000 in revenue from 10,000 or 20,000 customers. Given our current resources and team, we can happily serve 2,000 Draft customers, plus all our other customers.
Same gross revenue but dramatically less customer service costs. Smart growth not fast growth. (Note: The only way 37Signals can do things this way is that they only have one investor – Jeff Bezos, from Amazon)
As the picture shows, you can have a big pie with a big customer service expense. Or you can have a smaller pie with a lot less customer service headaches. Same profitability at the end of the day but the circle on the right is a lot easier to manage in a startup environment.
There’s a direct correlation between the quality of a customer service experience and the rate of growth at that company. Given the power of social media, companies have to be super careful to get this ratio correct. If not, word spreads too fast (especially within a tech community) and it becomes even harder to sell to the Early Majority with bad word of mouth out front.
In an early-stage (or any stage) company, don’t be afraid as the marketing lead to speak up and bring up the importance of letting customer service keep up. These people are often times the most important brand ambassadors, despite their salaries not necessarily reflecting their contributions.
In: Research
7 Oct 2010I taught a short intro course this week at Montana State University on Social Media. Preparing for the lecture, I was surprised to learn a few key things in the way the different social media technologies have been adopted to date, namely Facebook and Twitter.
Note: Data is from Edison Research – conducted February 2010 – Twitter Usage in America 2010.
While Twitter has enjoyed great buzz this hasn’t necessarily meant a huge wave of adoption. The research does show a startling spike in awareness from 5% in 2008 to 87% in 2010 with people over the age of 12.
A great example of how people can know about your product but not know its value.
Watch the full video here from Edison:
In: Strategy
1 Oct 2010In preparation for an upcoming course I’m teaching at Montana State University, I’ve been combing through some of the literature put out by HubSpot, which is a company specializing in inbound marketing software.
Today, they had a brilliant viral marketing idea for pushing a viral buzz and getting potential subscribers. In short, they’re driving leads to their website via a variety of social media channels, qualifying them through the sign up process, and in exchange offering a free 28 page PDF download on PR. But they’re relying on the community to do the heavy lifting for them. Much like GroupOn’s model, the catch is 500 people have to sign up by 6:30 EDT today for everyone to get the download.
A smart strategy for three reasons:
Can’t ask much more than that from a marketing campaign.
Extra Credit: How can you create a piece of educational content that could help your customers in an area of their business? Instead of the boring, “enter your email here” = instant download, can you bake some viral ingredients in like HubSpot just did? Enter any ideas in the comments below.
In: Branding
27 Sep 2010Here’s a no-brainer for attracting the right kind of clients and employees to your company…write an out of the box ‘About Us’ page.
Check out Seth Godin’s post on the five things you must have.
In the tech world, most companies have lame websites with cool color palettes and tons of cheesy stock photography. Break out of this mold and put your culture up there front and center. If you’re stuffy and that works for your clients – don’t change a thing.
But if you’re honest and don’t pull any punches, you’ll find that it does two things:
It all starts with having the guts to be just a little bit different.
In: Strategy
30 Aug 2010
As an update to an earlier post on the Amazon Kindle’s marketing strategy, Jeff Bezos did an interview on Charlie Rose (watch the video here). Amazon is well known for its patience and Bezos offers a few clues on how the company plans to compete.
Here’s how Amazon is differentiating it based on product features:
The Kindle is poised to take advantage of the ADD that we all have for using electronic devices. The New York Times is running an on-going series around this called “Your Brain on Computers“. Potentially shutting off Twitter, Facebook, and the Angry Birds game to focus on reading might prove to help those who struggle with staying on task.
Amazon is clearly aiming at only the serious reader who happens to be an early adopter. Given the psychographics of such, these folks do have a fondness for gadgets and might be willing to tote an iPhone, a Blackberry, an iPad, and a Kindle for good measure. The challenge will be hitting the Early Majority of customers who are pensive about shying away from physical books but realize that they’ll have to use a digital reader at some point. The low price of the basic Kindle reader could help and lessen the fear of being burned but the lack of convergence poses a big problem.
Game time: For Amazon to succeed, they absolutely have to deliver a brilliant customer experience for reading. Going head to head with Apple on product design is not an enviable challenge. However, if the company can build an experience and kick off a word of mouth among bookworms, it could carve out a nice niche.
Bonus: At around 37:00 minutes, Bezos gives his take on the future of marketing with social media. In short, conversations happen faster and we’re relying on our network to recommend us products and services. Bezos says to look for R&D budgets to grow and marketing budgets to shrink as companies realize it’s too expensive to market junk.
In: Theory
23 Aug 2010
We almost all now belong to a platform for some sort of online conversation, whether it be Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Digg, or (insert favorite social media website).
With the recent ability to set up groups or “channels” around special topics, users can create meeting halls to hold conversations.
Have you ever noticed that most of these are dead zones?
Usually all activity is produced by the one ignorant marketer who keeps posting press releases about “Company X Revolutionizes Technical Process with Keyword Phrase Nobody Cares About”. Over time, the room becomes empty as this person keeps posting useless drivel and reports back to their supervisor that yes, they do indeed have a social media presence. ‘Don’t worry boss, I’m on it’.
This same mindset of spray and pray has carried over from traditional media. Instead of a print ad in a trade publication, we now have it as a post on one of these websites. It seems the mindset is, “Let me shout at you about stuff you don’t care about, whether you gave me permission to or not.”
I don’t think these marketers fully appreciate how much they alienate those online. This deafness coupled with the ease to join and create online networks results in a lot of wasted opportunity and brand equity.
Here are three tips to avoid making similar mistakes in your efforts using social media to communicate within your network:
Using social media is really like going to a cocktail party. We’ve all been pinned down by the person who goes on and on about their dull job and has nothing interesting to say. Yet, there are those that are interesting, curious people and they quickly have a small group surrounding them, laughing and discussing things.
I think we all know who we’d like to have a drink with.

With the downswing in the economy, everybody is preaching the idea of doing start-ups. There is a general uneasiness that traditional companies can no longer provide stable employment. Entrepreneurship looks better than ever to many people.
On the fence? Below is a list of the top ten reasons on why you should not do a tech startup.
Now this list is not meant to discourage but rather add a dash of healthy skepticism to your enthusiasm or a potential business partner. (This list is based in part on my experiences of being involved in start-ups and researching early stage ventures.)
Recently, Netscape and Ning founder Marc Andreessen did an hours worth of Q&A at Stanford on everything from consumer electronics to venture funding. One key component he mentioned for start-up success was the idea of 10X.
To quote:
Is there a 10X change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10X faster or 10X cheaper or 10X better? And if it’s not 10X then we as VC’s and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves is it really worth doing? ….For a new company to exist it not only has to bring a product to market but it has to be so much better it punches through the sort of status quo.
Great advice and an easy litmus to apply to new ventures. One thought to add would be the idea of morphing a concept until it gets to be 10X better. If you comb through different tech success stories, you’ll see that companies typically had an idea, got a bit of funding, and then got to Plan B where they really hit their home run. The first idea or prototype certainly wasn’t a 10X improvement. Why most tech start-ups blow up is they spend all their money without any room for Plan B. A solid market validation exercise would help narrow the bull’s eye (more on this in upcoming posts) and solid metrics for evaluating success are key to leave a little gas in the tank to pivot the strategy.
Note: I’m a huge fan of Stanford’s eCorner website. Not only do they have great speakers come in, you can download and watch the videos for free through iTunes. The quality of the speakers is impressive and the diversity of topics makes it so almost anyone in the startup/tech arena can find something of interest. Get the experience of being on the Stanford campus with none of the overhead.
In: Strategy
23 Jun 2010The New York Times recently ran a fascinating story on technology and distractions called, “You Brain on Computers”. Read the full story here.
Much like a quick hit of a cigarette, researchers are finding that people crave the constant buzz of a fresh email or new tweet. It goes on to state that as much as we’d all like to believe we can multi-task, we’re not that good and vastly limit our effectiveness. Case in point: only 3% of people who claim to be “great multi-taskers” actually are when subjected to tests.
In short, we’re constantly distracted and we’re starting to like it even though we’re not good at it.
Here’s the wake-up call for the tech marketer: Nobody cares about you. Nobody will read your white paper. Nobody wants to sit through your 30 minute software demo.
I think the opportunity to market a technical product or service effectively hits on three key areas, regardless of the medium:
Our daily lives are destined to be more filled with static. If you want to get ahead, look for methods to market that align with the reality of how we live today.
In: Strategy
16 Jun 2010I recently did a quick post on Amazon’s Kindle and how it’s time for all or nothing. In the B2C world, product development cycles are brutal. While Kindle definitely had the first-mover advantage, it’s feeling the hot breath of the iPad breathing down its neck. Honestly, Apple may just have too much brand momentum and past experience to be stopped.
Why?
Apple is an old pro at the fast-follower game and watched the mini-disc and early MP3 devices fail miserably at a seamless user experience. They smartly came in and redefined the category, built the platform, and owned the portable music market. Next up was phones – and while they only own 15% of the mobile market, you can see the broad influence the design and the Apps Store has had.
However, it’s not as hopeless as it may seem. Let’s do a quick thought experiment if we were tasked with a marketing strategy for saving Kindle in order of importance:
And finally, play up the fact that the Kindle is not on AT&T. Enough said.
For those that are brave enough to market the technical